Check out this report:
It is cheaper to buy a home than to rent one in 39 of the nation’s 50 largest cities, according to a quarterly report released by Trulia (Sacramento is ranked 8th):
Top 10 cities to buy vs. rent:
| Rank |
City |
State |
Price-to-rent ratio |
| 1 |
Las Vegas |
Nev. |
6 |
| 2 |
Phoenix |
Ariz. |
7 |
| 3 |
Arlington |
Texas |
7 |
| 4 |
Fresno |
Calif. |
8 |
| 5 |
Miami |
Fla. |
8 |
| 6 |
Mesa |
Ariz. |
8 |
| 7 |
Jacksonville |
Fla. |
9 |
| 8 |
Sacramento |
Calif. |
9 |
| 9 |
Detroit |
Mich. |
10 |
| 10 |
Omaha |
Neb. |
10 |
A price-to-rent ratio of 1 to 15 means that it’s much cheaper to buy than to rent in a particular city. A ratio between 16 and 20 means that it’s more expensive to rent than to buy, but, depending on the family’s situation, buying could “make financial sense”. Any ratio above 20 indicates that owning is much more costly than renting in a city.
I don’t know how the authors of this artice got to 9 (for Sacramento), but based of the reletive real estate prices and the relative rents, I would guess that Davis would be in the 15 to 25 range.
Andrew@DavisCalifornia.com